⚖️ Misguidance of the Judicial System — Who is Responsible?

Image
⚖️ Misguidance of the Judicial System — Who is Responsible? Author: Arun Ramchandra Pangarkar Founder: Shramik Kranti – Voice of the Poor 📌 Introduction In a democratic country like India, the judicial system is considered the final hope of the people. The belief that “justice will be served” gives strength to the common man to live. However, in today’s situation, this trust often appears to be shaken. The question arises — why is the judicial system being misled? ⚖️ The Web of False Evidence In many cases, it is observed that both plaintiffs and defendants present fake documents, forged certificates, and misleading reports. Behind this, there is often involvement of corrupt administrative officials who prepare false documents in exchange for bribes. ➡️ Courts deliver judgments based on the evidence presented. ➡️ But when the evidence itself is false, justice also becomes flawed. Often, even decision-making authorities either deliver incorrect judgments due to greed or delay decisions...

India’s Law-Based Justice System: Does It Truly Deliver Justice?

Shramik Kranti – Garibon Ka Aawaz

 

India’s Law-Based Justice System: Does It Truly Deliver Justice?


A fundamental question haunts the common citizen again and again — “Do courts really deliver justice?” This question arises not from emotion, but from lived experience.

1) Is the Indian justice system ideal?

India’s justice system is law-centric. On paper, it appears democratic, egalitarian and rights-oriented. In practice, however, it has become —

  • Highly complex for ordinary citizens
  • Expensive and painfully slow
  • More procedure-oriented than justice-oriented

As a result, justice often takes a backseat to legal technicalities.

2) Is truth actually investigated in courts?

Modern courts function less as truth-finding institutions and more as evidence-evaluating mechanisms.

Only what is presented as legal evidence is treated as truth. The poor, illiterate or oppressed may speak the truth, yet fail to prove it within rigid legal frameworks.

Thus, many times — truth loses while technical law prevails.

3) Is dependence on lawyers necessary for justice?

In today’s system, justice without lawyers is nearly impossible. Legal language and procedures are inaccessible to common people.

Lawyers should be facilitators of justice, but too often the system turns justice into a commercial service.

Is justice a fundamental right, or a commodity for sale?

4) Is the Constitution also responsible?

Indian constitution is regarded as one of the finest in the world.

Bharat Ratna doctor Babasaheb Ambedkar laid a strong foundation for social justice.

Yet the Constitution —

  • Granted vast powers to courts
  • Did not simplify justice delivery for citizens
  • Guaranteed the right to justice, not justice itself

5) Can justice be delivered by directly hearing victims?

In principle — absolutely. That is what real justice should look like.

But case overload, fear of misuse, and systemic pressures prevent such a humane model from emerging.

Conclusion

  • Law is prioritized over justice
  • Procedure over truth
  • Privilege over equality

✊ Justice is not charity — it is a right.


✍️ Arun Ramchandra Pangarkar, Pioneer, Shramik Kranti – Voice of the Poor

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

✍️ अखेर अवतरली गंगा; शिवपिंडीवरील रक्ताभिषेक पावन झाला लोकप्रतिनिधींच्या भगीरथ प्रयत्नांना यश

भारतातील शेती व्यवसाय: बाजारभाव जुगारासारखा का झाला? इतर देशांतही अशीच परिस्थिती आहे का?

Poisoned Food, Rising Cancer and Chemical Farming: This Is Not Just a Mistake, It Is a Crime