📖 My Journey Through People's Movements (From the Year 2000 to the Present) Part 6 The 2010 Anti-SEZ (Special Economic Zone) Movement

 

📖 My Journey Through People's Movements

(From the Year 2000 to the Present)

Part  6

The 2010 Anti-SEZ (Special Economic Zone) Movement

A People's Struggle to Protect Farmers, Agriculture and Rural Livelihood

In 2010, the Government proposed to acquire a large area of agricultural land in the eastern part of Sinnar Taluka for the proposed Japan Corridor Industrial Project. Official notices and signboards announcing the proposed land acquisition were installed in several villages, creating widespread concern and uncertainty among local farmers.

Since the land was to be acquired at the government's notified rates, most farmers feared that the compensation would not be sufficient to purchase equivalent agricultural land elsewhere. For many families, this meant the possible loss of their only source of livelihood.

During this period, certain local political leaders publicly supported the project. They argued that the region was drought-prone, agriculture was becoming increasingly unviable due to water scarcity, and industrial development through the Special Economic Zone would generate employment, promote economic growth and improve the standard of living. According to them, the compensation received could also be used to purchase land in irrigated areas or establish small businesses.

However, discussions with local residents indicated that there was a widespread perception that some influential individuals expected financial gains through land transactions associated with the project. Against this backdrop, a group of young activists decided to launch a peaceful public awareness campaign.

Public meetings, village gatherings and awareness programmes were organised across the affected villages. Signatures were collected from villagers and representations opposing the proposed land acquisition were regularly sent to the Government of India. These memoranda reflected the concerns of the farming community and appealed for protection of their agricultural land.

As the final phase of the movement, an indefinite hunger strike was launched in front of the Sinnar Tahsil Office. The district administration promptly took notice of the agitation and initiated discussions with representatives of the movement.

Government's Position

The administration maintained that the eastern region of Sinnar was chronically drought-affected and that agriculture alone could not ensure sustainable livelihoods. According to its view, industrialisation through the proposed Special Economic Zone would create employment opportunities, stimulate economic development and enable landowners to invest their compensation in alternative land or businesses.

The Movement's Counter-Argument

"If sufficient water infrastructure could be created for industries and the new townships that would emerge under the SEZ project, then the same planning could also be undertaken to supply water for agriculture. Once irrigation reaches the eastern part of Sinnar, farming would flourish and unemployment would naturally decline. Sustainable agriculture would provide a far more permanent solution than replacing farmland with industries."

This argument significantly influenced the course of discussions. Instead of viewing industrialisation as the only solution, the movement highlighted that resolving the region's long-standing water crisis would strengthen agriculture, protect livelihoods and generate lasting rural prosperity.

Ultimately, the Anti-SEZ People's Movement succeeded, and the proposed land acquisition did not proceed further. The movement once again demonstrated the strength of organised, peaceful and democratic public action in safeguarding the interests of farmers.

Beyond Land Acquisition

This struggle was not merely about preventing the acquisition of agricultural land. It represented a broader movement to protect agriculture, secure water resources, preserve rural livelihoods and defend the dignity and future of farming communities.

✊ The Struggle Was Never for an Individual...

It Was Always for Society and Public Welfare.

Author
Arun Ramchandra Pangarkar

Founder
Shramik Kranti Mission – Garibon Ka Aawaz

---

To be continued...

© 2026 Shramik Kranti Mission – Garibon Ka Aawaz